War
on Tobacco: At What Cost?
Press
Release
6 May 2000
War
Against Tobacco threatens Liberty and Economic Development,
warn International Experts
In a new
book, War on Tobacco: At What
Cost? international experts point out that the cost
of the new war against tobacco is unacceptably high, both economically,
and politically. Deepak Lal, Coleman Professor of International
Development at University of California, Los Angeles, and one
of the two contributors to this volume, reviews the recent World
Bank report on tobacco and finds that contrary to the Bank’s
claim, there are significant positive effects of growing and
using tobacco.
Mr.
Gurcharan Das released the book at a function on 6 May,
2000, in New Delhi. Prof. Lal summarised his paper. Dr.
Shreekant Gupta of Delhi School of Economics, commented
on the paper, and the meeting was chaired by Dr. Bibek
Debroy of Rajiv Gandhi Institute of Contemporary Studies.
There was a livey question and answer session at the end.
The programme schedule of this event is available
here.
In his
paper, Prof. Lal, while acknowledging that tobacco use is
harmful, warns against making unjust economic claims against
tobacco in the health activists attempt to reduce smoking.
The Bank proposes increasing taxes on tobacco, but Prof. Lal
finds that the economic welfare losses from existing taxes
are huge. He says, “For India, the per smoker loss from current
taxation is nearly twice per capita GDP, and the aggregate
loss from current and future taxation (of, say, a 10% per
annum increase in taxes for 10 years) would be a massive 80%
of current GDP.” The anti-tobacco crusade from the West, like
the environmental one as manifested at the WTO meeting Seattle
last December, is the newest manifestation of the neo-imperialistic
desires.
Prof.
Lal concludes that the Bank provides no cogent reasons for
its crusade against tobacco in the developing world, particularly
since most of the costs and benefits are privately borne in
these countries. “The attempt to inflict the estimated large
losses of economic welfare on poor people is wicked and shameful,
when for so many of these poor the noxious weed is one of
the only sources of pleasure in lives which remain nasty,
brutish and short.”
The second
paper in this volume is by Professor Roger Scruton,
a well-known British philosopher and writer. He warns of the
harms to national sovereignty of allowing the World Health
Organisation to dictate global policy on tobacco. Furthermore
Scruton makes an eloquent defence of smoking - The WHO has
no right to tell you if you can smoke. Smoking is a choice,
not a disease. Mrs Brundtland, the head of WHO is trying to
become a global nanny, and to export her desires for a Tobacco
Free World (through a UN style Convention), she has resorted
to claiming that tobacco is a disease. Scruton is alarmed
that by claiming tobacco as a disease it opens the floodgates
to more conventions, perhaps on drink, drugs, cars all of
which kill, the list is endless.
“In our
secular age, it is more than ever necessary to safeguard the
old idea of law, as a guardian of individual freedoms, rather
than an instrument of enforced conformity. Wherever legislation
is unnecessary it is wrong. And the decision whether it is
necessary should be ours, and made through our elected legislatures”,
writes Scruton. It seems ironic, that at a time when “democratisation”
and “devolution” are the buzzwords, unelected and unaccountable
trans-national agencies such as the WHO are formulating global
legislation “in order to impose the social and political agenda
of handful of activists.”
Barun
Mitra of Liberty Institute, writing the foreword to this
volume says that democracy empowers the citizen by giving
him the freedom of choice in the political domain. By the
same token it is untenable to suggest that the same citizen
is incompetent to exercise the same freedom to decide on more
mundane issues such as whether to smoke or not. Mitra also
points out a number of instances where people have voluntarily
sorted this issue without recourse to any legislation. “Depending
on the nature of their passengers, many privately operated
chartered bus services in Delhi, often charge extra for qualities
such as smoke free rides or allowing smokers.” This is in
contrast to the failure to bring in even one prosecution under
the recent law in Delhi that prohibits smoking in many public
and private places, although the law is observed more in the
breech.
War is
always painful and expensive. Clearly, the one on tobacco
is no exception, but it can easily be avoided. It requires
recognition of fellow human beings as necessarily equal. The
message may be simple, but human history is a story of a continuous
struggle to claim that equality. Let’s not add tobacco to
that onerous list.
The book,
War on Tobacco: At What Cost,
is priced at Rs 100/-, and is available from Liberty Institute.
It is the fourth in the series of occasional papers brought
out by the Institute. The Institute is a public policy research
and educational organisation dedicated to highlighting the
fact that political and economic freedoms are two sides of
the same coin, and that separating one inevitably endangers
the other.
|